- #Devonthink vs. eaglefiler pdf
- #Devonthink vs. eaglefiler archive
- #Devonthink vs. eaglefiler pro
- #Devonthink vs. eaglefiler software
Devon’s search is much better than most with BEFORE, NEAR, and much more. Devon is the document scanner repository and I let it do the OCR. Mostly I use Eaglefiler for my old eudora mail which works well enough that I haven’t done a proper conversion of it to Mail. I also (under)use both Eaglefiler and Devonthink Pro. I’ve always liked it’s interface, though these days I mostly use it to open my old Acta files. It’s basic compared to Omni, but depending on taste and needs could be good enough.
#Devonthink vs. eaglefiler software
Outlining Software For Pros - OmniOutliner Feature Comparison Chart - The Omni Groupĭavid Dunham has also kindly made his Opal (an updated Acta from the Classic days) free now, and it should run at least through Catalina.
Outlining Software For Pros - OmniOutliner - The Omni Group They have a comparison table to help choose. There are also iOS versions that can sync–the prices are similar to the mac versions. During the trial you can swap back and forth between Essentials and Pro.
#Devonthink vs. eaglefiler pro
I love OmniOutliner Pro, which has an Essentials version for $20 (non-subscription, 14 day trial) as well as an extremely powerful Pro version ($100). Since hierarchy is important for you, you should check out outliners.
#Devonthink vs. eaglefiler pdf
In other words, if I put add a 5 MB PDF or picture, does the storage consumed go up by 5 MB or something noticeably more? I save PDFs only occasionally how would a document management program be better than saving a file (text, Pages, Word, whatever) with my notes and a PDF (if any) in a folder?ĭo either or both of DevonThink and EagleFiler have any problem storing information in iCloud and supporting two users on different Macs? Since I have only the no-cost storage in iCloud (5 GB), I would be disappointed the program’s storage tended to use more space than necessary. Please compare briefly one or the other to the Finder (which obviously does have nesting capability). I got the impression from a comment in a TidBITS thread (that I didn’t save) that EagleFiler did not do nesting or did not do it well. For example, I have a note in Notes where I try to record information from TidBITS that I think I might want in the future, but I would like to be able to have Notes > TidBITS > macOS and Notes > TidBITS > iOS (and probably Notes > TidBITS > other). Most of what I save is short synopses that I write and URLs that point to where I got the information that I summarized. Please compare briefly one or the other (that’s not an exclusive or) to Notes, which I think would suit my purposes if it allowed nested notes. Once upon a time, I downloaded EagleFiler, but without a specific goal, I didn’t get much from it. I read the thread that cited, but most of it was too foreign to my experience to be meaningful. I would be interested in a comparison of DevonThink and EagleFiler, but perhaps more interested in a comparison between either of the two and the Finder and Notes.
Happy to discuss further if you can narrow the focus of your questions a bit! Both Michael Tsai (for EF) and the Devon Technologies people have done excellent jobs for many years and I can recommend either product. If you haven’t tried them, I recommend downloading the demo versions of both.
Sorry but I can’t do justice to your last two questions because of the depth of features of both programs.
#Devonthink vs. eaglefiler archive
I use DTP for full scale (to my own needs) document/info processing, including storage of all my own records, storage/manipulation of records involving research and other database support, and as an historical archive for supporting future projects (i.e., a database of 10s of thousands of archived PDFs and RTFs of “clipped” on-line periodicals over the last 6+ years or so). I use EF primarily for daily journaling and email archives (a very simple and fast feature). EagleFiler (EF) is the more straight-forward, less expensive product providing powerful but limited capabilities while DTP is more expensive with greatly extended features. documents in a structured database format. Wow–a complete answer could easily run to book length (in fact, Take Control’s Joe Kissell has written an e-book on DevonThink Pro (DTP)).Īt a high level, both products are used to store, search, sort etc.
0 kommentar(er)
